Legal Opinion
Eisenberg v. District Attorney of County of Kings
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 1, 1994No. CV-93-1647PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
Defendant District Attorney of the County of Kings (the “District Attorney”) premises his motion to dismiss the Complaint on two grounds: (1) that service of process was improper, and (2) that the Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff Mitch Eisenberg, in turn, cross-moves for entry of a default judgment; to amend the Complaint; and to disqualify the District Attorney from representing himself. For the reasons set forth below, the motion to dismiss is granted, and the three cross-motions are denied.
PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Whitfield v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- McKeon v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2000
- Pennington v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Cohen v. RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- DeJesus-Vasquez v. BethencourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.