Legal Opinion

Whitfield v. City of Philadelphia

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2008No. Civil Action 08-417PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.

Before this Court are Rufus Whitfield’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) claims against the City of Philadelphia, Lynne Abraham (“Abraham”), the Philadelphia District Attorney, and Catherine Marshall (“Marshall”), Chief of the Appeals Unit of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office (collectively “Defendants”). Whitfield contends that Defendants’ decision to appeal the vacatur of his illegal prison sentence on “technical procedural grounds” violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendants filed…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Estate of Tyler ex rel. Floyd v. GrossmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. BATCHELOR v. SPAGNOLETTIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. BATCHELOR v. SPAGNOLETTIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. BROOKINS v. WETZELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API