Whitfield v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Before this Court are Rufus Whitfield’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”) claims against the City of Philadelphia, Lynne Abraham (“Abraham”), the Philadelphia District Attorney, and Catherine Marshall (“Marshall”), Chief of the Appeals Unit of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office (collectively “Defendants”). Whitfield contends that Defendants’ decision to appeal the vacatur of his illegal prison sentence on “technical procedural grounds” violated his constitutional rights under the Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments. Defendants filed…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Estate of Tyler ex rel. Floyd v. GrossmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- BATCHELOR v. SPAGNOLETTIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- BATCHELOR v. SPAGNOLETTIDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- BROOKINS v. WETZELDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- BROWN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.