Fry v. Denver & R. G. R.
District Court, N.D. California
At Raw. Action by Elizabeth Fry against the Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company. On demurrer to the complaint.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN FEHET, District Judge.
[1] The action was commenced in a state court against the defendant, sued as a Colorado corporation, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged! to have been suffered by plaintiff at Pueblo, Colo., while a passenger on defendant’s railroad, through the defendant’s negligence; it being alleged as a basis oE maintaining the action in this state that, at the date of the injury, the defendant was and now is “doing business” therein. The de<-feiulaut removed the cause to this court for diversity of citizenship, and has now interposed a demurrer challenging the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Southern Pac. R. v. GoodrichU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Rishmiller v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Thomson v. Meridian Life InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
- O'Neill v. Lang Transp. Corp.District Court, D. Nevada · 1937
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.