Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. R. v. Goodrich

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided May 22, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Equity. Bills by the Southern Pacific Railroad Company against Goodrich and others to quiet title to land. Respondents demur.

1Opinion of the Court

McKENNA, Circuit Judge,

(orally.) This is a bill in equity to quiet title to certain real estate. The bill alleges the incorporation of the company, and contains the usual allegations of the grant of the land to complainant by the act of July 27, 1866, and that it is within 20 miles of said road, and not reserved, and that the United States had full title thereto, and that it was free from pre-emption or other rights; that the company had filed its map of definite location, and built its road, which was accepted, and that it had performed all other conditions required to earn the land, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Holland v. ChallenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Hipp v. BabinSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  3. Van Wyck v. KnevalsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Frost v. SpitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Deseret Salt Co. v. TarpeySupreme Court of the United States · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pankey v. OrtizNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Davidson v. CalkinsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
  3. Buchanan Co. v. AdkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1909
  4. Johnston v. Corson Gold Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1907
  5. Fry v. Denver & R. G. R.District Court, N.D. California · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API