Legal Opinion
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Jack Tubb
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1957No. 16380PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
This action was upon an automobile dealer’s open theft insurance policy. The insurance company claimed that the loss was excluded from policy coverage by the following provision:
“7. EXCLUSIONS. The policy does not apply:
“(d) Under any Coverage — to loss resulting from either the insured voluntarily parting with title and possession of any automobile if induced so to do by any fraudulent scheme, trick, device, false pretense, or from Embezzlement, Conversion, Secretion, Theft, Larceny, Robbery or Pilferage committed by any person including any employee, entrusted by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Trammell v. WhitlockTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- United States Ins. Co. of Waco v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court · 1954
- Fenley v. OgletreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Woodard v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Freedman v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Camera Mart, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1968
- Mock v. Missouri Union Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Milburn v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Aetna Insurance Company v. KaplanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965