Legal Opinion

Camera Mart, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 6, 1968PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHabold Brans, J.

Plaintiff corporation, engaged in the sale and rental of motion picture equipment, was duped by an unknown person and deceived into relinquishing merchandise valued at $6,104.

Prior to August 29, 1966, the plaintiff on numerous occasions had sold and leased such equipment to a television program known as Candid Camera. On the day stated, following the usual procedure, plaintiff’s employee received a telephone call from someone representing to be a representative of Candid Camera, and in the conversation enumerated items of professional motion picture equipment which were to be furnished to a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hartol Products Corp. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Abrams v. Great American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Aleksich v. Industrial Accident FundMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Goldsmith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  5. Freedman v. Queen InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. M.H. Lipiner & Son, Inc. v. The Hanover Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Great Northern Insurance v. Dayco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  3. American East India Corp. v. Ideal Shoe Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Great Northern Insurance v. Dayco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Citizens National Bank v. OsetekDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API