Legal Opinion
Milburn v. Federated Mutual Implement & Hardware Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 9, 1960No. 38609PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
This action was commenced by R. Kenneth Milburn, d/b/a Ken Milburn Ford, against the Federated Mutual Implement and Hardware Insurance Company of Owa-tonna, Minnesota, to recover for the claimed loss of an automobile allegedly covered by the company’s policy.
The amended petition alleged payment of the premium and issuance of a policy to plaintiff which, among other things, con tained an exclusion clause. This exclusion clause provided:
“The Policy Does Not Apply: Under any coverage — to loss resulting from either the insured voluntarily parting with title and possession of any…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ætna Life Insurance v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Wheeler v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- Jacobson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lester v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Outwest Bean, Inc. v. NATIONAL F. INS. CO. OF HARTFORDColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
- Aetna Insurance Company v. KaplanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
- Mann v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Waters Motor Co. v. Grain Dealers Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.