Claim of DeWall v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MACY, Justice.
Appellant Wayne DeWall (the claimant) appeals from the district court’s order which affirmed the hearing examiner’s decision to deny his claim for worker’s compensation benefits.
We affirm.
ISSUES
The claimant presents the following issues for our review:
1. Is the decision of the hearing [examiner] arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise not supported by the, evidence, and contrary to law?
2. More specifically, does the Order incorrectly set forth fundamental uncontro-verted facts and thereby arbitrarily deny [the claimant] worker[’s] compensation benefits?
FACTS
The claimant worked for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Latimer v. Rissler & McMurry Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Cronk v. City of CodyWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by15 opinions
- Stutzman v. Office of the Wyoming State EngineerWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Scott v. McTiernanWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Hat Six Homes, Inc. v. State, Department of Employment, Unemployment Insurance CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- US West Communications, Inc. v. Wyoming Public Service CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Beitel v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.