Worker's Compensation Claim of Cronk v. City of Cody
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
Appellant, Joe Cronk, Sr. (Cronk) appeals from the district court’s reversal of a worker’s compensation award. Appellant claims that the district court erred in concluding that his injury was not work related.
We affirm.
Appellant presents two issues:
1. The Hearing Officer’s determination that Appellant suffered a work related injury is supported by substantial evidence, is in accordance with law and is not arbitrary capricious, nor an abuse of discretion.
2. The District Court improperly reweighed the evidence presented at the contested hearing and thus its decision must be…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wyoming Steel & Fab, Inc. v. RoblesWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Stuckey v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Taylor v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martinez v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Brees v. Gulley Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- Antelope Valley Improvement v. State Board of EqualizationWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Division v. FisherWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Cabral v. Caspar Building Systems, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.