Legal Opinion

Hile v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1928No. 20630PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKinkade, J.

George D. Hile, plaintiff in error, as a taxpayer, brought an action in the court of common pleas of Cuyahoga county against the city of Cleveland and certain executive officers of the city, including the chief of police, Jacob Graul, in which action Hile sought to restrain ‘by injunction the payment by the city to Graul of his salary as chief of police.

The facts alleged by Hile, as a basis for the relief sought, were, in brief, that Graul had been appointed chief without being required to pass a civil service examination, as called for by. Section 10, Article XV, of the Ohio Constitution,…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Susan Fisler Silberstein v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. State Ex Rel. Heinig v. City of MilwaukieOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. S.C. S.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Fortune v. Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API