Legal Opinion

Drennen v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 6, 1959No. 5-1817PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

From a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and dismissing the cause of action, the plaintiffs bring this appeal. The issue presented to us is whether the complaint stated a cause of action for mandamus against Hon. Bruce Bennett, Attorney General of Arkansas.

Drennen and others, as citizens, taxpayers, and sportsmen residing in the present 6th Congressional District, alleged in their complaint:(1) That Arkansas Constitutional Amendment No. 35 (adopted by the people in 1944) provided that the Arkansas State Game and Fish Commission (hereinafter…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scott v. McCoySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  2. Vanhoose v. YinglingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. CousanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  2. U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. White v. HankinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  4. Torvinen v. RollinsNevada Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Pakay v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API