White v. Hankins
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Frank Holt, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether the appellant Governor Frank White’s appointment of appellant Raymond Pritchett, confirmed by the senate, to the Arkansas State Highway Commission was contrary to Amendment 42, Ark. Const. (1874), which provides “that no two Commissioners shall be appointed from any single Congressional District.” Shortly after the appointment appellee sought a declaratory judgment that Patsy Thomas-son, an existing member of the Commission, and Raymond Pritchett were both residents of Pulaski County or the same Congressional District. The appellee later…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Green v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Drennen v. BennettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pakay v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1995
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2003
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1997
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.