Legal Opinion

SQUARE D. ENVIRONMENTAL CORP. v. Aero Mechanical, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1982No. Docket 57481PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue on appeal is whether as a prerequisite to recover against a payment bond pursuant to MCL 129.201 et seq.; MSA 5.2321(1) et seq., a subcontractor needs to strictly comply with the provisions of that statute. The trial court concluded that strict compliance was necessary and, therefore, granted a motion for summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs claim against the payment bond.

Square D Environmental Corporation (Square D) was a subcontractor of Aero Mechanical, Inc. (Aero), which was a subcontractor of the principal general contractor, Elgin Builders, Inc. (Elgin). The Insurance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. O'BRIEN v. Hazelet & ErdalMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn. v. Agricultural Marketing & Bargaining BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Charles W. Anderson Co. v. Argonaut InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Larry T. Wilson, and Cross-Appellant v. Thomas L. Beebe, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. National Waterworks, Inc v. International Fidelity & Surety, LtdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Pi-Con, Inc. v. a J Anderson Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Pi-Con, Inc v. A. J. Anderson Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Royalite Co. v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API