Legal Opinion
Scott v. Mattingly
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided August 21, 1992No. S-89-848PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBoslaugh, J.
Hazel Scott, the plaintiff-appellant, brought this civil rights action based on 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 to 1988 (1988) and Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-926 (Reissue 1989) and 20-148 (Reissue 1991) against the defendants-appellees, the State of Nebraska, the State of Nebraska Department of Health, the State of Nebraska Bureau of Examining Boards, and various individuals, both individually and in their official capacities, employed by those entities. Scott claims denial of due process and equal protection. Appellees moved for summary judgment based on res judicata, collateral estoppel, waiver, failure to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Scott v. State Ex Rel. Board of NursingNebraska Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Igal v. Brightstar Information Technology Group, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Moulton v. BOARD OF ZONING APP., LINCOLNNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. YoungNebraska Court of Appeals · 1995
- Ballard v. Giltner Public SchoolsNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Cunningham v. Prime Mover, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.