Harter v. Seaman
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Circuit Court. Seaman was the plaintiff below and Harter the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
This was an action of trespass on the case, in which there were two issues joined to the country, a jury trial, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. It appears of record by a bill of exceptions, that the plaintiff produced as a 'part of his evidence, a number of receipts which he duly proved, but did not at that time read them; but that, afterwards, his counsel read them to the jury in his closing argument; to which the defendant objected, because they had not been before read, but the objection was overruled. It also appears by . the bill, that the plaintiff opened a deposition…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Crocker v. HoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Parmlee v. SloanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Carey v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Leas v. CoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Welch v. WelchCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1855