Legal Opinion

Carey v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 17, 1979No. 2-1278A438PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Judge.

The appellant, Wilbur Carey, was found guilty of possession of a narcotic drug, heroin, in violation of the Indiana Uniform Controlled Substances Act, IC 1977, 35-48-4-6. He appeals the trial court’s refusal to permit questioning of the arresting officer, called as a witness by the defense, either directly or indirectly as to the identity of the confidential informant on whose information a search warrant was issued.

The State urges that Carey has waived this issue by his mistaken characterization of the questions as cross-examination. We do not think this mistake was material.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Ortiz v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. City of Fort Wayne v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Taylor v. FitzpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Thomas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dorton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Indianapolis v. ParkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Phelps v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Phelps v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API