Legal Opinion
Wein v. Crockett, Dist. Judge
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1948No. 7128PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LATIMER, Justice.
In dealing with the parties to this action, Morris M. Wein will be referred to as plaintiff and C. C. McDermond as defendant. The facts as detailed in this opinion are as indicated in the pleadings and may not be the same as those ultimately determined if the matter is tried on the merits.
On or about May 1, 1947, Morris M. Wein, a resident of the State of California, entered into a contract with de fendant, C. C. McDermond, a resident of Salt Lake County, wherein he, Morris M. Wein, agreed to pay C. C. McDer-mond the cost of constructing a certain building plus a 10 per cent…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Wuchter v. PizzuttiSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smyth v. Twin State Improvement Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1951
- Conn v. WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1959
- Hill v. Zale CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. CordNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- PRUDENTIAL FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION v. William L. Pereira and AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.