Legal Opinion

People v. Allen

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1963No. Crim. 8172PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJefferson, J.

In an information filed by the District Attorney of Los Angeles County, defendant was charged with a violation of Penal Code, section 470, forgery, in six counts.

Defendant was represented by counsel and pleaded not guilty to each count. The jury returned a verdict of guilty on counts I, II, III, V, and VI, and not guilty on count IV. Defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied. Proceedings were suspended and probation granted for a period of three years on each count to run concurrently. Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order denying motion for a new trial.

Donn…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Treadwell v. NickelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. People v. RuizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Guardianship of JacobsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. People v. ForkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. People v. PetsasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API