Legal Opinion

People v. Fork

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1965No. Crim. 4433PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, J.

Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction after a jury verdict finding him guilty of forgery (in violation of Pen. Code, § 470). The jury also found to be true the allegation in the information as to a prior felony conviction, defendant having denied this allegation.

Questions Presented

1. Was the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction?

2. Did the trial court err in ruling that defendant’s prior conviction was a felony rather than a misdemeanor, thus allowing the jury to consider it?

3. Was the testimony of the police officers as to certain statements which defendant made to them…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. AtchleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. StoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. KatzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. CullyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API