Legal Opinion

People v. Petsas

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 20, 1989No. A042890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERSON, J.

The People appeal from an order dismissing an information pursuant to Penal Code section 995, arguing that the trial court erred when it held that respondent, Kosta J. Petsas, had been held to answer without reasonable or probable cause. We agree and reverse the trial court’s order of dismissal.

I. Procedural Background

On April 15, 1986, a complaint not before us was filed in the San Mateo Municipal Court charging respondent with criminal violations unspecified by the record. That complaint apparently alleged respondent had violated certain provisions of the Insurance Code.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rideout v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MARK MARKS, PADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. People v. SinghCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API