Legal Opinion

People v. Moore

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1963No. Crim. 4156PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Question Presented

MOLINARI, J.

The sole question presented on these appeals from judgments of conviction for the crime of burglary is whether there is sufficient corroborative evidence to sustain the convictions.

The Record

Three witnesses testified at the trial, to wit: Lloyd L. Murray, Sesto Luzzi and Robert W. Hayes. Additionally, the testimony of Joseph Uvdic and Charles Quackenbush given at a preliminary hearing was received pursuant to stipulation.

Uvdic testified that sometime between 1:15 a. m. and 7 :15 a. m. on November 25,1961, a tavern owned by him and known as “Jess & Joe” was broken…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. AnjellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. People v. AtwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. People v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. People v. JackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API