Legal Opinion

Gal v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 1, 1957No. A. R. D. 72; Entry Nos. 720153/1; 708931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

There is before us appellant’s petition for review of the decision and judgment below in two appeals to reappraisement, consolidated for trial (R. 2, 66), reported in Nicholas Oal (Globe Shipping Co., Inc.) v. United States, 36 Oust. Ct. 555, Reap. Dec. 8573. Appellant claims reversible errors in findings of fact and conclusions of law of the trial judge.

The merchandise is aluminum metal-covered paper of 10 grades, imported from Germany. Errors are assigned with respect to all 10 grades. On oral argument, appellant limited the appeal to three of the grades, being those…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MassinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Chas. E. Washburn Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Magnesium Elektron, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Zanes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. American Bravo Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  4. Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. Vasquez v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API