Legal Opinion

Zanes v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 11, 1959No. Reap. Dec. 9557; Entry No. 205-C, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement, consolidated for trial, which are enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and *569made a part hereof, relate to certain synthetic iron-oxide pigments exported from Germany from October 1952 through September 1955. The merchandise in question was manufactured by Farbenfabriken Bayer, hereinafter referred to as Bayer, and was exported by Harold Scholz & Co., for the account of Frank D. Davis Co., Los Angeles, Calif.

Entry of the merchandise was made at unit invoice prices, less non-dutiable charges, plus an addition to make market value.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. Newberg & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  2. Gal v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  2. American Bravo Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API