Legal Opinion

Chacoty v. Tillerson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 17, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2014-0764Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BARAK CHACOTY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 14-764 (RDM) MIKE POMPEO,1 U.S. Secretary of State, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs contend that they are U.S. citizens by birth pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1401(c). That provision confers birthright citizenship on a person born abroad, as Plaintiffs were, if both her parents are U.S. citizens and one of her parents “has had a residence in the United States” prior to her birth. 8 U.S.C. § 1401(c). Each of the Plaintiffs applied to the State Department for…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API