Legal Opinion

Meherin v. Oaks

California Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1885No. 7656PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. " The facts-are-stated in the-opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.

The question involved in this appeal arises under section 2957 of the Civil Code, which reads as follows:—

“ A mortgage of personal property is void as against creditors of the mortgagor and subsequent purchasers and encumbrances of the property in good faith and for value, unless:—
“ 1. It is accompanied by the affidavit of all the parties thereto, that it is made in good faith, and without any design to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors.
“ 2. It is acknowledged or proved, certified and recorded, in like manner as grants of real property.”

The chattel mortgage was properly executed by Jones,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wood v. FranksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cady v. PurserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Richman v. Bank of PerrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Alferitz v. IngallsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1897
  4. Oaks v. ScheifferlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. In Re KesslerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API