Jobe v. Lapidus
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentMcGARRY, Chief Justice
I respectfully dissent. This Court should assert jurisdiction in this case because the appeal was timely perfected.
I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the February 9, 1993 summary judgment was final for purposes of appeal. A judgment is not final unless it disposes of all parties and all issues in a case. Felderoff v. Knauf, 819 S.W.2d 110, 111 (Tex.1991) (per curiam). A final judgment disposes of all of the issues involved so that no future action by the trial court will be necessary in order to settle and determine the entire controversy. K & S Interests, Inc. v. Texas Am.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Remington Arms Co., Inc. v. CaldwellTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
- K & S Interests, Inc. v. Texas American Bank/Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
- Felderhoff v. KnaufTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Lindley v. Flores, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.