Legal Opinion
Lindley v. Flores
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided May 24, 1984No. 13-83-342-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
Appellant, by his points of error, complains that the trial court erred in entering an order granting appellee’s Motion for Sanctions compelling appellant to pay attorney’s fees directly to appellee’s attorney because (1) there are no pleadings to support the judgment and (2) the attorneys were not parties.
This ease arises from a suit on a contract. On April 4, 1983, defendant/appel-lee filed a Motion for Sanctions. On or about April 11, 1983, there was a jury trial with a verdict against appellee, resulting in a judgment filed on April 11th against ap-pellee. On May…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McInnes v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1983
- Bass v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Phillips v. Vinson Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- City of Hurst v. City of ColleyvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Fenno v. Jacobe, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Jobe v. Lapidus, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
- Evans v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Crain v. San Jacinto Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
- In Re Guzman, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Tri-M Erectors, Inc. v. Clearwater Constructors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.