Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Eich

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1896No. 17,916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellee commenced this action to foreclose certain mortgages executed by the appellants upon the real estate therein described. Appellant, Patrick Rogers, filed his answer in four paragraphs, the first being a general denial, the second averred payment, and the third alleged that the defendant had sold and conveyed to the plaintiff the mortgaged premises for the sum of $4,250.00, which amount it was alleged was due and unpaid, and he sought to set off this amount against plaintiff’s demand and prayed judgment over for the remainder due. The fourth paragraph was by way of cross-complaint, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Freeland v. CharnleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Carlson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Xenia Real Estate Co. v. MacyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Board of Commissioners v. FertichIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Citizens' Street Railroad v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Dean v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chicago & Calumet Terminal Railway Co. v. EggersIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API