Legal Opinion

McDowell v. Willis

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1927No. Docket No. 4486PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEAIRS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the above-named defendants who had signed .a proposed agreement for exchange, reading as follows:

“This agreement witnesseth: That J. Willis, Maria A., Theresa S. and Frances W. Griebnow owner of the following described . . . First Piece of property situate, lying and being in California, County of Imperial ... all of which we desire to exchange for the following Second Piece of property owned by S. R. Clark and wife, situate lying and being in California, County of San Diego, City of San Diego. . . . Terms:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. TorrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Jennings v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  3. Olson v. LovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Mullarky v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Devereux v. SirkusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. C. Forsman Real Estate Company v. HatchIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API