Legal Opinion
Aguilar v. Lerner
California Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 2004No. S099667PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
On February 18, 2004, we ordered Attorney Raul V. Aguilar and Attorney Allen J. Kent to show cause before this court why each should not be held in contempt of court for the willful neglect of the duty to appear for oral argument before this court in Aguilar v. Lerner (2004) 32 Cal.4th 974 [12 Cal.Rptr.3d 287, 88 P.3d 24] on February 10, 2004. Each attorney filed a return and thereafter appeared before this court, by counsel and in person, on March 9, 2004, providing statements and arguments and answering questions posed by the court.
On March 17, 2004, after considering the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Arthur v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Lyons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- In Re CiraoloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Inniss v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kobayashi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Conservatorship of BecerraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Magana v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Cakebread v. Berkeley Millwork & Furniture Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
- In Re RinggoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.