Legal Opinion
Guerra v. Jaramillo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 6, 2014No. Nos. 12-60024, 12-60025PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Appellants Joe Guerra and Raymundo Lujano appeal the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order sanctioning them for bad faith under the bankruptcy court’s inherent authority. Reviewing the sanctions order for abuse of discretion, Miller v. Cardinale (In re DeVille), 361 F.3d 539, 547 (9th Cir.2004), we affirm.
1. Appellants received appropriate notice and process, and the bankruptcy court did not violate their due process rights. The BAP correctly held that the sanctions here were civil in nature because they were compensatory.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William Ludwig v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- O'GUINN v. Lovelock Correctional CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re Les Deville, Debtor. In Re Steven J. Dagget, Debtor. In Re Daniel Miller, Debtor. Daniel Miller, Jr. Arlo Hale Smith v. Noreen CardinaleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Blixseth v. Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alegre v. ContrerasDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021
- Candace Kallen, et al. v. United States Trustees OfficeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2026