Legal Opinion

Alegre v. Contreras

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 2, 2021No. 3:16-cv-02442Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Cindy Alegre, et al, Case No.: 16-cv-02442-AJB-KSC 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER: 13 v. (1) DENYING JOINT MOTION TO 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., SEAL, (Doc. No. 205); 15 Defendants. (2) GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO 16 STRIKE, (Doc. No. 207); 17 (2) DENYING JOINT MOTION TO 18 SEAL AS MOOT, (Doc. No. 207); and 19 (3) DENYING JOINT MOTION FOR 20 SANCTIONS (Doc. No. 207) 21 22 Presently before the Court is the parties’ joint motions to: (1) seal their joint motion 23 to strike with exhibits, (Doc. No. 205); (2) strike…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Debbie Foltz, Consumer Action United Policyholders Texas Watch, Intervenors, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, and Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and California Institute of Medical Research & Technology, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Dba Comprehensive Medical Review Ralph Householder Steven Becker v. April Jean Ho Jim Mathis, Plaintiffs-Intervenors. Debbie Foltz, April J. Ho Jim Mathis Tierney Adamson Kevin Snead Daniel P. Johnson, Intervenors, and Consumer Action United Policy-Holders Texas Watch, Intervenors-Appellants v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, an Illinois Corporation, and Steven BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API