Legal Opinion

In Re the Commitment of Jaramillo

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 25, 2008No. 2 CA-MH 2007-0002-SPPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 After a jury trial, appellant Wilfredo Jaramillo was found to be a sexually violent person and was committed to the Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center pursuant to Arizona’s Sexually Violent Persons (SVP) Act, A.R.S. §§ 36-3701 through 36-3717. On appeal, Jaramillo argues the trial court committed reversible error by admitting evidence of unproven prior acts in violation of Rule 404(c), Ariz. R. Evid. Because the trial court correctly concluded that Rule 404(c) does not apply to this prior-act evidence, we affirm.

Factual and Procedural…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  2. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  3. In Re the Care & Treatment of HaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Orfaly v. Tucson Symphony SocietyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re MH 2007-001264Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State of Arizona v. David J. WallerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. In Re the Commitment of Wilfredo JaramilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  4. In Re Thomas R.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. In Re Ms2015-000003Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API