Legal Opinion

State v. Tolliver

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1976No. C-75396PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowd, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction for sexual battery (R. O. 2907.03), consisting of a constitutional challenge to R. C. 2907.03(A)(1) and a claim that the trial court’s instructions to the convicting jury were prejudicially erroneous.

The defendant was indicted and tried for the offense of rape (R. C. 2907.02). Following the testimony, the trial court advised counsel that he had decided to charge the jury on the lesser included offense of sexual battery which provides, in part, as follows:

“R. C. 2907.03
“(A) No person shall engage in sexual conduct with another, not the spouse of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. State v. KasnettOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  3. City of Cincinnati v. TaylorOhio Supreme Court · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Herbert MackCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. In Re J.A.S., Ca2007-04-046 (12-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. ThomsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Ohio v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. SkaggsOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API