City of Cincinnati v. Taylor
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Bbown, J.
This court is asked to determine the constitutionality of the Cincinnati prowling ordinance. The question is presented to this court with a record that fails to indicate what conduct of appellants violated the ordinance. We agree with Justice Black who, in Coates v. Cincinnati (1971), 402 U. S. 611, 617, said: “It is a matter of no little difficulty to determine when a law can he held void on its face and when such a summary action is inappropriate. * * * ” We are mindful that in a situation such as is presented here we have a grave responsibility not to act prematurely — to enter into a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- City of Seattle v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Columbus v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. TolliverOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- City of Cincinnati v. AdamsHamilton County Municipal Court · 1974