Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. Taylor

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1973No. 73-71PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Bbown, J.

This court is asked to determine the constitutionality of the Cincinnati prowling ordinance. The question is presented to this court with a record that fails to indicate what conduct of appellants violated the ordinance. We agree with Justice Black who, in Coates v. Cincinnati (1971), 402 U. S. 611, 617, said: “It is a matter of no little difficulty to determine when a law can he held void on its face and when such a summary action is inappropriate. * * * ” We are mindful that in a situation such as is presented here we have a grave responsibility not to act prematurely — to enter into a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. City of Seattle v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Columbus v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. TolliverOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. City of Cincinnati v. AdamsHamilton County Municipal Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API