Legal Opinion
State v. Kasnett
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 1973No. 72-584PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. BbowN, J.
At the outset, it must be observed that the majority of the Court of Appeals was anatomically in error in concluding that the flag was ‘ ‘ over the anus ’ ’; and that the conclusion in the concurring opinion, that the young man sat on the flag, does not seem to be material to a charge of having a flag sewn on his pants pocket.
R. a 2921.05 cannot be said to specifically prohibit the use of the flag as an article of clothing, as an attachment or a decoration or a patch thereon. If the General Assembly chose to proscribe the wearing of the flag as an item of wearing apparel, there is little…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Ashton v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wright v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- State v. TolliverOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- United States Ex Rel. Radich v. Criminal Ct. of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Jermaine D. English v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.