Dwornik v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Claimants, owning property situated at the corner of Amherst and Thompson streets in the city of Buffalo, have been awarded $3,000 for damages caused by a grade crossing elimination in the vicinity. None of their property was taken, there was no change of grade in either street in front of their property, and they were not cut off from all means of ingress and egress. Under these circumstances there is no statutory provision *676which creates any liability to claimants for their damage, if any damage there be. And, of course, there is no common-law liability.
Claimants base their right to damages…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reis v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Fearing v. . IrwinNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Miller v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- In re the Discontinuance of a Portion of Joiner Street in the City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- In re HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coffey v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- In re City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1955
- Jablowsky v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Buffalo Co-operative Stove Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Solkat Realty Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.