Legal Opinion

In re City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1955PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

Here we have presented one of the most elusive problems in the field of condemnation law. It arises as a result of the legal closing of a part of a street, thus producing a dead-end or cul-de-sac street with access only in one direction. The question concerns the right to compensation of an owner whose property fronts on the unobstructed portion of the street.

This proceeding became necessary when the city decided to build a school, Junior High School 71, on Avenue B in the borough of Manhattan extending from Fourth to Sixth Streets, thus occupying the bed of East Fifth Street for a distance…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. The People v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  3. Sauer v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Coster v. Mayor, Aldermen & CommonaltyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  5. Bohm v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. 10.0 Acres, Etc., and 33.4 Acres, Etc., Gesford P. Wright and Marie R. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Wells & River Holding Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Counihan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1959
  4. Gervasi v. Board of Commissioners of Hicksville Water DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Low v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API