Legal Opinion

Holsinger v. Commercial State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1933No. 31,067PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

In this action plaintiffs are seeking to trace funds arising from liberty bonds which had been placed in the Commercial State Bank for safe-keeping. The bank became insolvent, and its assets had passed into the hands of a receiver. The purpose of the action is to have the court adjudge that the funds are entitled to a preference. While the state bank was solvent and a going concern several parties deposited their liberty bonds with it for safe-keeping. On September 11, 1930, the bank, being insolvent, was taken over by the state banking…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chetopa State Bank v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Secrest v. OrganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  3. Nelson v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  4. Bloomheart v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Peoples State Bank v. Burlington State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parker v. State ex rel. SebringSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. Amberg Schwab & Co. v. Commercial State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API