Legal Opinion

Amberg Schwab & Co. v. Commercial State Bank

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1933No. 31,197PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action to have a claim against a failed bank and its receiver established as a preferred claim. The trial court overruled a demurrer to the amended petition, and defendants have appealed.

It is alleged in the petition that plaintiff is a corporation, with its principal office in New York City; .that the defendant, the Commercial State Bank of Rosedale, hereinafter called the bank, was organized and conducted business under the banking laws of the state; that Del W. Yeamans & Company, Inc., was a depositor in the bank, and had to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hanover State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Clark v. Toronto BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Arnold Investment Co. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Chetopa State Bank v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Secrest v. OrganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wieczorek v. RaineyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Amberg Schwab & Co. v. Commercial State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API