Amberg Schwab & Co. v. Commercial State Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Harvey, J.:
This is an action to have a claim against a failed bank and its receiver established as a preferred claim. The trial court overruled a demurrer to the amended petition, and defendants have appealed.
It is alleged in the petition that plaintiff is a corporation, with its principal office in New York City; .that the defendant, the Commercial State Bank of Rosedale, hereinafter called the bank, was organized and conducted business under the banking laws of the state; that Del W. Yeamans & Company, Inc., was a depositor in the bank, and had to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Hanover State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
- Clark v. Toronto BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
- Arnold Investment Co. v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Chetopa State Bank v. Farmers & Merchants State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Secrest v. OrganSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wieczorek v. RaineyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Amberg Schwab & Co. v. Commercial State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934