Legal Opinion

People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and new trial granted. Memorandum: On our review of a judgment convicting defendant of sexual abuse in the third degree, we conclude that the court’s failure to sequester the jury requires reversal notwithstanding the fact that defendant expressly consented to that procedure (see, People v Coons, 75 NY2d 796, 797; People v Dasher, 161 AD2d 1207, 1208, lv denied 76 NY2d 855; People v Webb, 161 AD2d 1167, lv granted 76 NY2d 897; People v Smith, 161 AD2d 1160, 1161, lv denied 76 NY2d 865; CPL 310.10). We note that the verdict is supported by sufficient…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CoonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. DasherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. People v. WebbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API