People v. Coons
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
During the course of the jury deliberations, the trial court permitted the jurors to go to their homes for dinner, separately and unsupervised. CPL 310.10 provides that a deliberating jury "must be continuously kept together under the supervision of a court officer” (emphasis supplied). This section mandates the jury’s seclusion during deliberations (see, People v Bouton, 50 NY2d 130, 138). The trial court erred in failing to keep the deliberating jury continuously together under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. AhmedNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. BoutonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. AgramonteNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. MorrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.