Legal Opinion

People v. Paul

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 5, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals, judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon remittitur of this case from the Court of Appeals, we consider those contentions previously raised by defendant but not decided by us (see, People v Paul, 174 AD2d 996, revd 79 NY2d 970). We conclude that the verdict finding defendant guilty of third degree sexual abuse is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence (People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). Further, the court did not err in denying a hearing on defendant’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct. There was no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. PaulNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API