Legal Opinion
(PC) Ardds v. Hicks
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 6, 2020No. 1:18-cv-01324Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTOINE L. ARDDS, Case No. 1:18-cv-01324-NONE-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN 13 v. CLAIMS AND DENIAL OF EX PARTE MOTION FOR RELIEF AS MOOT 14 D. HICKS, et al., (ECF No. 32) 15 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 Plaintiff Antoine L. Ardds (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on 20 September 21, 2018, and the matter was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.