Legal Opinion
Glengariff Corp. v. Snook
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1984PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Beatrice S. Burstein, J.
This case, apparently one of first impression, involves the scope of a Federal statute and regulation and a counterpart State regulation, each of which essentially requires that payments received from Medicaid by a provider of services shall be accepted as payment in full.
Plaintiff seeks summary judgment, pursuant to CPLR 3212, claiming there are no issues of fact, or, in the alternative, for an order dismissing defendants’ affirmative defenses, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [b]), on the ground they have no merit. Defendants cross-move for an order,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- In Re the Probate of the Will of CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Abramovich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hurlbut v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Bates v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Estro Chemical Co. v. FalkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Opinion No. Oag 66-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987