Legal Opinion

Jack Leverett v. The City of Pinellas Park

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 15, 1985No. 84-3867PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

I. FACTS

Appellants in this case are Jack Leverett and Tom Whitaker, officers and sole stockholders of Fresh Start, Inc., a Florida corporation, and Fresh Start, Inc., a Florida corporation d/b/a “Strip Ahoy.” Leverett and Whitaker own and operate Strip Ahoy, which offers live entertainment in the form of nude dancing. Strip Ahoy does not have a license to serve alcohol; however, we assume, as did the district court, that patrons of the business are allowed to bring in alcoholic beverages to drink while viewing the dancing.

On September 15, 1984, the City of Pinel-las Park enacted two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. California v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. City of Daytona Beach v. Del PercioSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sammy's of Mobile, Ltd. v. City of MobileCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Randall E. Lanier v. City of Newton, Alabama, Etc., Chief of Police in His Official Capacity of the City of Newton, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Ackerson v. Kentucky Judicial Retirement & Removal CommissionDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1991
  4. Geaneas v. WilletsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  5. Southern Entertainment Co. v. City of Boynton BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API