State ex rel. Montgomery v. Duncan
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARKER, Judge.
¶ 1 This is a special action in which the State sought relief from the trial court’s pretrial order permitting testimony at trial regarding Victim’s prior sexual conduct. Because this issue was not reviewable on appeal if there was an acquittal, we accepted jurisdiction. See State ex rel. Romley v. Dair-man, 208 Ariz. 484, 486, ¶ 2, 95 P.3d 548, 550 (App.2004) (“Pre-trial rights of victims ... will be lost if special action jurisdiction is not available.”). We subsequently issued our decision order granting relief. The State requested that the decision order be published…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rock v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. HuttCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
- Romley v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Montgomery v. PadillaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Timothy Andrew ParkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2024
- State v. KoganCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021