Legal Opinion

Melson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 1986No. 84-1585PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a sentence imposed by the trial court pursuant to the Federal Youth Corrections Act (FYCA),1 18 U.S.C. §§ 5005-5026 (1976). Appellant contends that it was error for the trial judge to impose sentence under the FYCA because the repeal of the FYCA took effect before the sentencing hearing. The government argues that the ex post facto clause of the Constitution requires that the FYCA remain available as a sentencing option for all offenses committed before the date of its repeal. We hold that the provisions of the FYCA were not available on November 8, 1984, for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Dorszynski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. United States v. Jerome F. Donelson, United States of America v. Andre WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. In Re the Welfare of B.C.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Holiday v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API