Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of B.C.G.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 26, 1995No. C4-95-524PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
The district court referred appellant for prosecution as an adult. Appellant challenges the district court’s decisions not to apply the 1994 amendments to the juvenile reference statute and to refer him for adult prosecution.
FACTS
Appellant B.C.G. is alleged to have committed criminal sexual conduct in the first degree in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342, subds. 1(a), 2, on or about December 21, 1994. Appellant was 17 years old on the date of the alleged offense. On January 11,1995, authorities filed a juvenile delinquency petition against appellant in Clay County…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Independent School District No. 810Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- State v. HarringtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Melson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. EngerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re the Welfare of J.S.H.-G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002