Shea v. Cloquet Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants, Cloquet Dumber Company and H. C. Hornby, from an order of the district court for St. Douis county, Cant, J., denying a motion for a new trial on condition that plaintiff consent to reduce the verdict to $1,200, after a trial and verdict in favor of plaintiff for $3,000.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action for malicious prosecution. Verdict for the plaintiff for $3,-000. The defendants moved for a new trial, which was denied, on condition that the plaintiff consent to a reduction of the verdict to the sum of $1,200. The plaintiff so stipulated, and the defendants appealed from the order. This is the second appeal herein, and reference is here made to the opinion of the court on the former appeal for a full statement of the facts-of the case. 92 Minn. 348, 100 N. W. 111.
1. The first assignment of error to be considered is to the effect that the trial court erred in receiving over the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodworth v. MillsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Peterson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- McIntire v. LeveringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Schuek v. HagarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Shea v. Cloquet Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Foster v. Chicago, Burlington Quincy Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Sappington v. FairfaxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Walker v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Cloquet Lumber Co. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.